Frontier Oil Corp. v. RLI Insurance

Caution
153 Cal. App. 4th 1436·63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 816
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2007B189158California13,184 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Frontier Oil Corporation (Frontier) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Wainoco Oil & Gas Company (Wainoco), appeal a summary judgment in favor of RLI Insurance Company (RLI). Frontier and Wainoco contend RLI has a duty to defend them in several personal injury actions arising from the operation of an oil and gas production facility adjacent to Beverly Hills High School in Beverly Hills, California. Frontier’s predecessor and RLI’s predecessor had entered into a liability insurance policy in Texas. The parties dispute whether RLI agreed under the terms of the policy to defend pollution claims and whether a duty to defend the underlying actions has arisen. Each of these questions presents a choice-of-law issue concerning the law governing our determination. Each choice-of-law issue in turn presents the threshold question of the applicable choice-of-law rule.

We conclude that notwithstanding the application of the governmental interest analysis to other choice-of-law issues, Civil Code section 1646 is the choice-of-law rule that determines the law governing the interpretation of a contract. Section 1646 states that a contract is to be interpreted according to the law and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.