Loduca

Loduca v. Polyzos

Good Law
153 Cal. App. 4th 334·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 780
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2007C050757, C052481California3,570 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

In this construction litigation, a property owner, as a third party beneficiary, sued a subcontractor in contract and tort for breach of the contract between the subcontractor and the general contractor. The trial court granted judgment in favor of the owner on breach of contract, but against the owner on negligent misrepresentation. The trial court also denied the owner’s request for prejudgment interest on the contract. However, the trial court granted the owner’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to an attorney fee clause in the contract. Both the owner and the subcontractor appeal, the former on the judgment denying prejudgment interest and negligence liability, the latter on the order awarding attorney fees. We affirm the judgment and attorney fee order in their entirety.

FACTS

In late 1998, plaintiff Vincent P. Loduca, Jr., began to develop property to build a custom home for him and his family. He retained MCM Builders (MCM) and its principal, Steve Mishler, to act as general contractor.

In early 1999, MCM solicited a bid from defendant George Polyzos, doing business as Quality Manufacturing Company (QMC), to manufacture and install custom cabinetry in the new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.