Arias

Arias v. Superior Court

Good Law
153 Cal. App. 4th 777·63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2007C054185California4,198 words

Opinion

Opinion

Saqui & Raimondo, Barsamian, Saqui & Moody, Anthony P. Raimondo, Michael C. Saqui, Fresno, for Real Parties in Interest.

BLEASE, Acting P.J.

At issue in this appeal is whether an individual bringing an action on behalf of himself and others under the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof.Code, § 17200 et seq.) and the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) must bring his representative claims as a class action.

We shall conclude that the UCL requires that a representative claim be brought as a class action because the UCL requires compliance with the class action provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 382. [1] (Bus. & Prof.Code, § 17203.) We shall further conclude that the PAGA expressly allows a person to prosecute a representative claim without requiring that it be brought as a class action. [2]

Petitioner Jose Arias brought this action against Angelo Dairy, and Luis, Maria, and Joe Angelo (hereafter referred to collectively as Angelo Dairy). Arias was a former Angelo Dairy employee, who alleged he was not compensated for overtime wages, and that he received no meal periods or rest breaks during his shifts. He alleged numerous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.