Sanchez

People v. Sanchez

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 871·189 Cal. App. 4th 374
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2010F057147California4,047 words

Opinion

Opinion

DAWSON, Acting P. J.—

Appellant, Luis Oscar Sanchez, pled no contest to cultivation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11358) and admitted allegations that he had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)). He also admitted that he violated probation in two other cases. Sanchez was promised a stipulated term of 32 months in exchange for his pleas and admissions. On January 2, 2009, the court sentenced Sanchez to the agreed-upon term—a total of 32 months for all three cases.

On appeal, Sanchez contends the court erred in its failure to conduct a Marsden [1] hearing when he indicated his desire to withdraw his pleas and admissions based on incompetence of defense counsel. We will find merit to this contention and remand the matter for further proceedings.

On May 10, 2008, Lindsay police officers responded to a house to investigate a 911 hang-up call and were told by Sanchez that he dialed 911 accidentally. The officers searched the house to make sure no one there needed assistance. Detecting a strong odor of marijuana in one room, the officers looked in the room's closet and discovered four marijuana plants growing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.