Leonard Carder, LLP v. Patten, Faith, & Sandford

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 652·189 Cal. App. 4th 92·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1751
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 2010B221940California2,756 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Leonard Carder, LLP, filed a declaratory relief action against Patten, Faith & Sandford (Patten) regarding distribution of attorney fees awarded in a stipulated judgment in a class action lawsuit. The trial court entered a judgment denying all relief to Leonard Carder on the basis the complaint did not present a case or controversy and that jurisdiction had been reserved with the judge who approved the class action settlement. Leonard Carder challenges both aspects of the trial court’s ruling. We reverse, holding that the complaint did articulate a justiciable case or controversy, the class action court specifically declined to retain exclusive jurisdiction over the distribution of attorney fees, and entry of judgment against Leonard Carder without transfer to the class action court was an abuse of discretion.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Leonard Carder and Patten were appointed class counsel in an action tried in 2004 before the Honorable Howard J. Schwab, with the bulk of the work on behalf of the plaintiff class performed by Leonard Carder. A judgment including attorney fees was reversed in part on appeal, and the action was remanded for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.