Steller

Steller v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 3d 824·189 Cal. App. 4th 175·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1773·75 Cal. Comp. Cases 1146
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2010B219935California3,492 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Counsel attending a mandatory settlement conference in superior court are encouraged to settle all differences between the parties. But, if they want to settle a civil action and a related workers’ compensation action, they must obtain approval of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). As we explain, the difficulty is not insurmountable and we fashion a remedy which is practical and workable, i.e., the settlement is conditional upon WCAB approval.

Wendy Ann Steller appeals from the judgment enforcing a settlement agreement between her and respondent, Sears, Roebuck and Co., erroneously sued as Sears Holdings Management Company. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6.) She contends that the trial court erroneously interpreted the settlement agreement as encompassing both of her actions against respondent: a civil action for disability discrimination and a workers’ compensation action. She argues that the settlement agreement encompassed only her civil action because Labor Code section 5001 requires WCAB approval before a workers’ compensation claim can be settled.

Neither the settlement agreement nor the judgment expressly requires that settlement of the workers’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.