Moore

Moore v. Kaufman

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 196·189 Cal. App. 4th 604
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2010B206679, B222125California5,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Frances L. Diaz petitions this court for relief from an order of the superior court finding her in contempt for refusing to comply with an order to answer questions at a judgment debtor examination. The underlying judgment awarded attorney fees against both Diaz and her then client Dr. Sheila G. Moore, jointly and severally, after a special motion to strike Moore’s complaint was granted. We hold that the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16) does not authorize an award of attorney fees against plaintiffs counsel. Because the underlying judgment is therefore void as to Diaz, we grant the petition.

BACKGROUND

This case has a long appellate history. Below is a summary of the portions of that history that are relevant to analysis of the present proceeding.

Diaz represented Dr. Sheila G. Moore in a lawsuit filed against Barry B. Kaufman in April 2000. Moore voluntarily dismissed the suit without prejudice but, one year later, succeeded in vacating the dismissal and having the action reinstated.

Kaufman filed a special motion to strike Moore’s complaint pursuant to section 425.16 and also filed a motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.