In Re Marriage of Starr
Opinion
Opinion
Rubin, J.
Starr Starr appeals from the judgment entered after the family law court found that the house he bought in his name only while married to former wife Martha Starr was community property and ordered him to convey the property to them both as tenants in common. The evidence shows that Martha quitclaimed her interest in the house based on Ron’s promise to put her on title after the purchase was completed, but that Ron failed to do so. As a result, the evidence supports a finding that the house was community property based on Ron’s violation of his fiduciary duties to Martha. We also conclude that the trial court properly valued the community and separate property interests in the house, and did not err in denying Ron’s request to refund his overpayment of child support credits. We therefore affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In late 1996, Ron Starr bought a house in Glendora, taking title in his name only as his separate property even though he was then married to Martha Starr. Ron filed for divorce in April 2004. In his petition, signed under penalty of perjury, he listed the house as community property, but sought the return of his separate property…