Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 695·2000 Daily Journal DAR 9701·83 Cal. App. 4th 523·99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 824·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7375
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2000F034780California11,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dibiaso, J.

Introduction

Real Party in Interest Sonora Union High School District (District) sued Sonora Mining Corp. (Sonora Mining) and petitioner Sonora Diamond Corp. (Diamond) for breach of contract. Diamond moved for an order quashing service of process on the ground the trial court was without personal jurisdiction over Diamond. The District’s position that jurisdiction existed relied upon three independent grounds—alter ego, agency (including the representative services doctrine) and availment. Ultimately, the trial court denied Diamond’s motion. In this opinion, we explore the nature of, and compare, the three jurisdictional theories advanced by the District and apply each to the record evidence. We will grant the petition and order appropriate relief.

Statement of the Case

On June 29, 1998, the District filed an action in Tuolumne County Superior Court for breach of a real estate sales contract. Named as defendants were Diamond, a Canadian corporation, and Sonora Mining, a Nevada corporation doing business in California. Sonora Mining is a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond. Diamond was not a signatory to the contract, but the complaint alleged that Sonora Mining was the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.