Friends of Davis v. City of Davis

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 413·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 744·2000 Daily Journal DAR 10493·83 Cal. App. 4th 1004
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2000C029236California6,586 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Following a lengthy joint planning process between the University of California, Davis (the University) and the defendant City of Davis (the City), the University issued a request for bids for a private concern to assume responsibility for commercial development of a small parcel of real property contiguous to the City’s downtown area. Real party in interest Fulcrum Davis, a business entity, was the successful applicant and obtained an option to purchase the property. At that point in time, the only discretionary approval which remained was site plan and architectural approval pursuant to the City’s design review ordinance. (Davis City Code, § 29-231 et seq.) When it was learned that Fulcrum Davis was negotiating with the Borders bookstore chain to open a bookstore in the proposed development, a number of persons objected. Taking the position that its design review ordinance does not encompass tenant approval, the City approved the design review application.

After unsuccessfully seeking relief in the trial court, plaintiff Friends of Davis (plaintiff) appeals, contending: (1) the City’s interpretation of its design review ordinance is incorrect and unconstitutional; (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.