Leyva

Leyva v. Nielsen

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 231·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 748·2000 Daily Journal DAR 10539·83 Cal. App. 4th 1061·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7977
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2000E025774California2,063 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

Plaintiff Ricardo Leyva, a prison inmate, filed this personal injury action against Jim Nielsen, Chairman of the Board of Prison Terms. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and plaintiff Leyva appeals.

Standard of Review

“Where a trial court sustains a demurrer without leave to amend, we review such action under the abuse of discretion standard. [Citation.] If there is a reasonable possibility that the pleading can be cured by an amendment, the trial court’s ruling will be reversed. [Citation.] [¶] On review, we examine the Complaint’s factual allegations to determine whether they state a cause of action on any available legal theory. [Citation.] We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts which were properly pleaded. [Citation.] However, we will not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law [citation] and we may disregard any allegations that are contrary to the law or to a fact of which judicial notice may be taken. [Citation.]” (Interinsurance Exchange v. Narula (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 1140, 1143 [ 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 752 ].)

Allegations of the Complaint

The complaint purports to allege causes of action for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.