Stuparich

Stuparich V.Harbor Furniture Manufacturing, Inc.

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 762·2000 Daily Journal DAR 10657·83 Cal. App. 4th 1268·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8058
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2000B135396California4,300 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

This is a dispute concerning a closely held family corporation. Plaintiffs and appellants, Ann Stuparich and Candi Tuttleton, appeal from judgment entered in favor of the corporation after the trial court granted summary judgment against them. The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs raised a triable issue of material fact regarding their claim that dissolution was appropriate under Corporations Code section 1800, subdivision (b)(5) (section 1800 (b)(5)). (Further statutory references are to this code except where another is identified.) That statute provides for the involuntary dissolution of a corporation where “[i]n the case of any corporation with 35 or fewer shareholders . . . liquidation is reasonably necessary for the protection of the rights or interests of the complaining shareholder or shareholders.”

We conclude that plaintiffs did not raise a triable issue of material fact that dissolution of the corporation was reasonably necessary to protect their rights and interests, and affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Plaintiffs are sisters. Harbor Furniture Manufacturing, Inc., was founded by their grandfather in 1929 as a furniture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.