Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. Blue Cross

Caution
83 Cal. App. 4th 677·99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 809
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2000B132500California6,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

In this case, appellant Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) attacks the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel the arbitration of a dispute with respondent Coast Plaza Doctors Hospital (Coast Plaza). After Coast Plaza filed an action against Blue Cross on numerous tort theories, all related to the reimbursement rates paid by Blue Cross pursuant to a service agreement with Coast Plaza, Blue Cross filed a petition to compel arbitration of Coast Plaza’s claims. The service agreement contained an arbitration clause, but Coast Plaza argued that it did not apply because (1) Coast Plaza had terminated the agreement two days before filing suit, (2) its action sought injunctive relief which, as a matter of law, is not arbitrable, and (3) the arbitration provision was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. The trial court denied Blue Cross’s motion.

After a review of the record, we are persuaded that the arbitration clause does apply to this dispute and is enforceable. Coast Plaza’s claim for injunctive relief can be severed and stayed pending the conclusion of the arbitration which may have the effect of resolving all issues between the parties. We therefore will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.