Christoff

Christoff v. Union Pacific Railroad

Bad Law
134 Cal. App. 4th 118·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1820·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13501·36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 6·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9885
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2005C047961California3,387 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiff Steven J. Christoff appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific), in plaintiff’s action alleging he was injured by a passing train while walking across a railroad bridge. Plaintiff contends triable issues exist regarding duty to warn and duty to remedy a danger. We shall affirm the judgment.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A motion for summary judgment should be granted if the submitted papers show that “there is no triable issue as to any material fact,” and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c) (section 437c).) A defendant meets his burden of showing that a cause of action has no merit if he shows that an element of the cause of action cannot be established, or that there is a complete defense. (§ 437c, subd. (p)(2).) Once the defendant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show that a triable issue of material fact exists. (Ibid.)

In cases where the plaintiff would have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, the defendant moving for summary judgment must present evidence that would preclude a reasonable trier…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.