Northrop Grumman Corp. v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 4th 424·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1837·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13657·36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9996
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 28, 2005B172863California4,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boren, J.

The County of Los Angeles assessed ad valorem property taxes on personal property allocated by a military defense contractor to the performance of its fixed-price contracts with the United States government. The progress payment clause of the federal contracts states that title to property allocable or chargeable to the contracts vests in the federal government. The county interprets this to mean that the United States takes a lien or security interest in the contractor’s property. We disagree with the county’s interpretation. Title means title. Title does not mean lien. Because the county cannot tax property owned by the United States, it must refund the taxes paid by the contractor on property allocated to the performance of its military contracts.

FACTS

Northrop Grumman Corporation (Northrop) is a Los Angeles County (County) contractor primarily engaged in the business of designing and building military aircraft and weapons systems for the United States government. It also manufactures commercial aircraft. Northrop uses four categories of personal property in its business: perishable tools, minor equipment, supplies, and technical books.

During the tax years in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.