Friese

Friese v. Superior Court

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 4th 693·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1859·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13852·36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 558
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 2, 2005D046348California6,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Corporations Code sections 25402 and 25502.5 are part of the Corporate Securities Law of 1968. (§ 25000 et seq.) In general, section 25402 prohibits so-called insider trading by the issuer of securities or by any person who is an officer, director or controlling person of an issuer. Until 1988 only purchasers or sellers of stock who could show that they had been harmed by virtue of insider trading had a right of action against violators of section 25402. In 1988 the Legislature added section 25502.5, which allows the issuer or anyone acting in the name of the issuer to recover from an officer, director or controlling person who has violated section 25402 up to three times the amount such a violator earned by virtue of his or her insider trading. Section 25502.5 is a disgorgement statute and the issuer does not need to show that it was harmed by the activities of the inside trader.

Section 25402 governs only securities transactions which occur in this state. Moreover, only issuers who have more than $1 million in assets and more than 500 shareholders may bring an action under section 25502.5. However, aside from those geographic and capitalization requirements, there are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.