Olsen

Olsen v. Harbison

Good Law
134 Cal. App. 4th 278·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1817·2005 Daily Journal DAR 13543·35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 909·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9953
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2005C048750California3,972 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Joseph F. Harbison III appeals from an order denying his special motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 to strike causes of action arising from acts in furtherance of a person’s constitutional right of petition or free speech, commonly known as an anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motion. (Further section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.) An order denying such a motion is an appealable order. (§ 425.16, subd. (j).) Respondent Christopher J. Olsen moves for dismissal of the appeal as frivolous and taken solely for purposes of delay and requests an award of sanctions.

Section 425.16, subdivision (f), provides that an anti-SLAPP motion may be filed more than 60 days from service of the complaint only “in the court’s discretion.” The motion here was filed 278 days after service of the most recent complaint and was denied as untimely. Harbison contends the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion.

We shall conclude that the appeal is frivolous because the claim of abuse of discretion indisputably has no merit. Consequently, we will dismiss the appeal and impose sanctions against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.