In Re Marriage of LaBass & Munsee

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 632·56 Cal. App. 4th 1331·66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 393·97 Daily Journal DAR 10325·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6346
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 1997C024945California2,877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Callahan, J.

After divorcing respondent Barry Neal LaBass (Barry) in Sacramento, appellant Catherine Whitman Munsee (Catherine) moved with their minor children to the Los Angeles area. However, instead of working full time as her ex-husband did, Catherine, who had a master’s degree in English literature, decided to teach part time at a local college while pursuing another postgraduate degree.

Barry petitioned the court to modify his child support obligation by imputing to Catherine the starting salary of a full-time school teacher rather than her actual earnings as part-time lecturer at a community college. The court granted the requested relief.

Catherine appeals, contending the court erred because (1) it failed to articulate reasons for departing from the guideline formula; (2) the imputation of income was unsupported by substantial evidence; (3) as a matter of public policy the court should not be permitted to impute income to the recipient-parent who is the primary caretaker of the minor children for purposes of reducing the amount of child support payable by the obligorparent; and (4) the modification order violates the parties’ marital settlement agreement. We find none of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.