Derderian

Derderian v. Dietrick

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 599·56 Cal. App. 4th 892·65 Cal. Rptr. 2d 800·97 Daily Journal DAR 9466·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 1997B096230California3,109 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

Plaintiffs and appellants Zaroug Sondra Derderian, Marilyn Mayda Derderian, Sophia Derderian-Assadourian, and Asdghhig S. Derderian appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant and respondent, William Dietrick, M.D., in their action for the alleged wrongful death of their mother, Mary Derderian. The trial court concluded that summary judgment was proper because the statute of limitations for appellants to bring their professional negligence claim (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5) was not tolled since appellants failed to provide respondent with actual notice of their claim as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 364, and therefore the statute of limitations for filing the action expired three months before the complaint was served and filed. We find based on the undisputed facts that appellants failed to comply with the requirements of section 364 and thus, the applicable one-year statute of limitations was not tolled and expired before their action was filed. Summary judgment was properly granted in favor of respondent.

Factual and Procedural Background

On October 5, 1992, appellants’ mother, Mary Derderian, was brought into the emergency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.