Harper

Harper v. Wausau Insurance

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 614·56 Cal. App. 4th 1079·66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 64·97 Daily Journal DAR 9861·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6021
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1997B107758California4,805 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, Geneva Harper, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, Wausau Insurance Company (Wausau). The present case involves a complaint for breach of contract and of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing on the theory plaintiff was a third party beneficiary of a medical payment provision in an insurance contract between Nationwide Insurance Company, a Wausau company, and L. A. Towers, Inc. In the published portion of this opinion, we discuss the existence of a triable issue as to whether plaintiff was an intended third party beneficiary of the medical payment insurance policy who may directly assert a cause of action for breach of contract against the insurer. For the reasons stated below, we conclude a triable issue existed as to whether she was an intended beneficiary of the medical payment provision of the policy who may seek contract damages. On that ground, we reverse the judgment.

II. Background

The complaint, which was filed on August 22, 1995, alleged causes of action for breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based upon defendant’s failure to pay plaintiff’s medical expenses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.