Hansen

Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 4th 1179·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 958·23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 30·93 Daily Journal DAR 12077·58 Cal. Comp. Cases 602
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 1993A061777California1,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

In this workers’ compensation proceeding, we granted the applicant’s petition for a writ of review to decide the question whether California Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (d), as applied to petitioner, violates her constitutional rights to equal protection of the law and due process. (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7, subd. (a).)

Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (d), provides in effect that no compensation shall be paid for an employee’s psychiatric injury resulting from a “ ‘regular and routine employment event’ ” unless the employee has been employed by the employer for at least six months. The requirement of six months’ employment does not apply to employees whose psychiatric injuries are related to a physical injury or result from a “sudden and extraordinary employment condition.’’ (Fn. 2, ante.)

Petitioner’s claim for psychiatric injury due to stress while working as a waitress for the El Rancho Tropicana Hotel in Santa Rosa was denied because she had not been employed by the hotel for six months. She argues that the requirement of six months’ employment is arbitrary and violates her constitutional rights to equal protection of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.