In Re Hirenia C.

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 4th 504·22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 443
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1993Docket Nos. A056944, A059717California4,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Donald W. Jenson for Interveners and Respondents in A056944.

Stephen Greenberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

OPINION

PHELAN, J.

Appellant Emmanuelle Rose timely appeals from an order denying her standing to participate in juvenile court proceedings with respect to a minor child, Hirenia C., as to whom appellant claims to be both a "person having an interest in a ... dependent child," within the meaning of section 388 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, [1] and a de facto parent. (1) (See fn. 2.) We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of appellant's petition for visitation rights. [2]

The following undisputed facts were before the juvenile court when it issued the order that is challenged in this appeal:

Hirenia C. was born on June 13, 1987, and placed approximately two weeks later in a foster care home which was shared by appellant and her "partner," Angela Ranaldi. Appellant herself is identified in court records as the person whose home was "found by this Court to be a fit and proper home" in which Hirenia could be and, in fact, was placed as of June 26, 1987. [3] Appellant and Ms. Ranaldi decided to pursue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.