Sims

Sims v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 4th 463·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 904·22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256·93 Daily Journal DAR 11200·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1993B072882California2,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perez, J.

Penal Code section 872, subdivision (b), enacted as part of the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act” (Proposition 115) in 1990, permits hearsay testimony at a preliminary hearing by a “law enforcement officer.” At issue in this case is whether an investigator for the Franchise Tax Board qualifies as a “law enforcement officer” for purposes of section 872, subdivision (b).

We find that section 872, subdivision (b), is not restricted in its application to “traditional” law enforcement officers authorized to carry weapons and make arrests, but rather is intended to encompass officers and agents with knowledge of the pertinent laws underlying the charged crime who can provide meaningful testimony at preliminary hearings. For that reason, we conclude section 872, subdivision (b), applies to officers and agents employed by a federal, state or local government agency: 1) who meet the threshold training and experience requirements set forth in that provision; and 2) whose primary responsibility is to investigate and prepare for prosecution cases involving violations of laws.

In this case, the Franchise Tax Board investigator who offered hearsay testimony at petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.