Covarrubias

People v. Covarrubias

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 4th 639·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 892·22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 475·93 Daily Journal DAR 11228·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1993B069174California1,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Fortino Perez Covarrubias appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) entered after he was convicted in a court trial of possessing cocaine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) He unsuccessfiilly contends: “The court erred in denying appellant participation in the diversion program.”

Ventura Police Officer Raymond Harer, Jr., saw a vehicle driven by appellant. He stopped it because it had a cracked windshield. Harer noticed that the passenger reached several times under the front seat. He conducted a “pat down” search of appellant for weapons. He felt a hard object which proved to be a metal pipe containing marijuana residue and smelling of burnt marijuana. Harer searched appellant and found several razor blades, a mirror, an empty tube, a plastic baggie containing cocaine, and three bindles of cocaine. Appellant exhibited several symptoms of being under the influence of a stimulant, i.e., a pulse rate of 118, rapid speech, and warm, dry skin. In addition, the officer observed that the septum of appellant’s nose was irritated and his pupils exhibited a sluggish reaction to light.

Appellant was charged with possession of cocaine, being under the influence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.