Gami

Gami v. Mullikin Medical Center

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 4th 870·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 922·22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 819·93 Daily Journal DAR 11565·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6780
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1993Docket Nos. B061197, B063306California5,174 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kitching, J.

I. Introduction

This is an appeal from the dismissal of three consolidated medical malpractice actions brought by parents, individually, and on behalf of their minor daughter, alleging damages for negligence and for wrongful life arising from the birth of a child with neural tube defects, commonly known as spina bifida. Plaintiffs and appellants Raksha and Naran Gami (the Gamis) appeal the judgment (order of dismissal) sustaining defendants’ and respondents’, Mullikin Medical Center, Juan Jose Arce, M.D., and Sylvia Arellanes (defendants), demurrers without leave to amend. Plaintiff and appellant Nandini Gami (Nandini), by her guardian ad litem Naran Gami, appeals the judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendants in an action for wrongful life.

As to the parents, the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrers on grounds that the Gamis’ actions were barred by the one-year statute of limitations period pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5. We need not resolve the issue of whether the Gamis properly pleaded a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, because we conclude that their actions were barred by the one-year statute of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.