Wheelock

People v. Wheelock

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 796·117 Cal. App. 4th 561·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 460·2004 Daily Journal DAR 4229·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2984
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 6, 2004A096854California3,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

Parrilli, J.

A jury convicted Thomas Franklin Wheelock of first degree murder with personal use of a firearm, and with the special circumstance that the murder was committed during a robbery. The jury rejected a special circumstance allegation that the murder was committed while Wheelock was lying in wait. After a penalty trial, the jury chose a sentence of life without the possibility of parole. The court imposed that sentence, and stayed a four-year term for the firearm use. Wheelock raises a series of claims on appeal. There was no reversible error, and therefore we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On November 24, 1997, Armored Transport, Inc. informed the Oakland police that one of its armored trucks was missing. Wheelock and Rod Cortez were the employees who had been on duty in that truck. The next day, the truck was found behind an auto parts store in San Ramon. Cortez’s body was in the truck; he had been shot three times in the right side of the head and neck.

On November 27, a Utah highway patrol officer stopped Wheelock as he drove a Ford Bronco without a rear license plate, which was a violation of Utah law. Wheelock gave the officer his driver’s license and a bill of sale for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.