Hankins

Hankins v. El Torito Restaurants, Inc.

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 360·63 Cal. App. 2d 510·63 Cal. App. 4th 510·74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 684·98 Daily Journal DAR 4191
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1998Docket Nos. A074012, A075621California7,878 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. Introduction

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from litigation between Mark Hankins, a disabled man, and the owners and operators of an El Torito restaurant located in Burlingame, California. The litigation was precipitated by Hankins’s visit to the restaurant in October 1991. During that visit, restaurant employees refused to permit Hankins to use an otherwise accessible “employee restroom.” Hankins sought damages and injunctive relief under state and federal law for this denial of access and for other alleged violations of state and federal laws which prohibit discrimination on the basis of a disability and prohibit denying disabled individuals access to public accommodations.

After a court trial, the court found El Torito’s refusal to permit Hankins to use the restroom violated California law and awarded Hankins $80,000 damages. The court also enjoined El Torito from requiring that a recently installed wheelchair lift be accessed and controlled only by restaurant employees. El Torito appeals each of these rulings. El Torito also contends the trial court erred by awarding Hankins’s expert witness fees as part of his damages.

Hankins cross-appeals, alleging the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.