Hankins

Hankins v. El Torito Restaurants, Inc.

Good Law
63 Cal. App. 4th 510·74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 684
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1998A074012, A075621California7,854 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified For Partial Publication [*]

HAERLE, Acting Presiding Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from litigation between Mark Hankins, a disabled man, and the owners and operators of an El Torito restaurant located in Burlingame, California. [1] The litigation was precipitated by Hankins's visit to the restaurant in October 1991. During that visit, restaurant employees refused to permit Hankins to use an otherwise accessible "employee restroom." Hankins sought damages and injunctive relief under state and federal law for this denial of access and for other alleged violations of state and federal laws which prohibit discrimination on the basis of a disability and prohibit denying disabled individuals access to public accommodations.

After a court trial, the court found El Torito's refusal to permit Hankins to use the restroom violated California law and awarded Hankins $80,000 damages. The court also enjoined El Torito from requiring that a recently installed wheelchair lift be accessed and controlled only by restaurant employees. El Torito appeals each of these rulings. El Torito also contends the trial court erred by awarding Hankins's expert witness fees as part of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.