Odello Brothers v. County of Monterey

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 387·63 Cal. App. 2d 778·63 Cal. App. 4th 778·73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 903·98 Daily Journal DAR 4498
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1998H017028California5,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Appellants sued the County of Monterey (County) for trespass and inverse condemnation, alleging that County was liable because County intentionally breached a levee and flooded appellants’ property. County moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted the motion. The trial court concluded that appellants’ inverse condemnation claim was barred under the emergency exception to the just compensation requirement. The trial court also determined that appellants’ trespass claim was barred because of the immunity afforded County.

On appeal, appellants argue that there are triable issues of fact regarding both the inverse condemnation and trespass claims. We conclude that triable issues exist with respect to the inverse condemnation claim but that there are no triable issues with respect to the trespass cause of action. Accordingly, we will reverse the trial court’s granting County’s motion for summary judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Facts and Procedural Background

The Odello Coast Ranch (Ranch) is located directly south of the Carmel River. The boundaries of the Ranch extend east and west of State Route 1 (highway…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.