Coshow

Coshow v. City of Escondido

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 687·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1420·2005 Daily Journal DAR 11265·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 19·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8311
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2005D045382California7,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Paul Coshow and several other residents of Escondido, California (collectively Coshow) sued the City of Escondido (City) and the California Department of Health Services (Department) for declaratory and injunctive relief, challenging City’s plan to fluoridate its drinking water with hydrofluorosilicic acid (HFSA) and claiming the use of HFSA violates their constitutional rights and exposes the general public to unnecessary health risks. The court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of City and Department after finding Coshow failed to state a cause of action for declaratory or injunctive relief.

Coshow appeals, contending; (1) the court erred by granting judgment on the pleadings based on motions in limine filed by City and Department; (2) he had standing to challenge City’s unconstitutional conduct and its impermissible expenditure of public funds under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1060 and 526a; (3) his fourth amended complaint alleged violations of fundamental constitutional rights to privacy and bodily integrity under the federal and state Constitutions; (4) the court erred by refusing to consider allegations that HFSA is a drug which the federal Food and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.