Knight

Knight v. Hayward Unified School District

Bad Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 121·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1339·2005 Daily Journal DAR 10375·33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 287·17 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 17
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2005A106449California5,719 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Andrew K. Knight, a teacher, appeals the grant of summary judgment by the trial court in favor of his employer, Hayward Unified School District (the District), on his claim of disability discrimination brought under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.). Appellant’s claim arises from the fact that the group health insurance policy provided by the District to its employees does not cover in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, which appellant and his wife required and were obliged to obtain at their own expense.

We shall affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

One of the group healthcare plans made available by the District to its employees was that of the PacifiCare Health Maintenance Organization (the PacifiCare Plan), which was the healthcare plan appellant selected for coverage. Though it covered many other forms of infertility treatment, the PacifiCare Plan specifically excluded PVF treatment from coverage. This exclusion applied to all District employees who selected the PacifiCare Plan, who were covered under the same terms and conditions.

Appellant’s wife, who was never employed by the District but was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.