Martinez

People v. Martinez

Bad Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 233·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1350·2005 Daily Journal DAR 10591·33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 328·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7753
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2005G034132California3,671 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

After the trial court denied his motions to traverse and quash the search warrant and to suppress evidence, defendant Robert Menchaca Martinez pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance (methadone), being under the influence of a controlled substance, possession of narcotics paraphernalia, and possession of a hypodermic syringe. He also admitted four prior strike convictions. After striking three of the prior convictions, the court sentenced defendant to a term of 16 months in state prison. Defendant contends the trial court improperly denied his motion to unseal a confidential attachment to the search warrant affidavit after reviewing the attachment in an in camera hearing and that the search warrant was not supported by probable cause. He further argues the officers, in executing the warrant, failed to comply with the knock-and-notice requirement of Penal Code section 1531, thereby rendering the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. While our task in this case was complicated by the erroneous return of excised search warrant material to the police, we find no reversible error.

FACTS

Investigator Pham prepared the affidavit used to secure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.