Urziceanu

People v. Urziceanu

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 747·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1419·2005 Daily Journal DAR 11249·33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 859·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8301
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2005C045276California13,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Defendant Michael C. Urziceanu claims he created a legal cooperative, FloraCare, to grow and supply medical marijuana for himself as a patient qualified to use it under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and for other patients and primary caregivers who also qualify under the Compassionate Use Act. The People assert defendant and his codefendant, Susan B. Rodger, were illegally cultivating and selling marijuana.

After trial, the jury acquitted defendant of cultivating marijuana, sale of marijuana, and being a felon in possession of ammunition. The jury, however, found him guilty of conspiracy to sell marijuana and being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.

Defendant argues the recently enacted Medical Marijuana Program Act supplies him with a defense. As to his conviction for conspiracy, defendant argues the court should have instructed the jury on the defenses of mistake of law and the vagueness of the Compassionate Use Act. He further contends the trial court erred in its ruling on his motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the knock-notice law.

As we shall demonstrate, the Compassionate Use Act, alone, does not authorize collective growing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.