Ross

Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc.

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 590·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1407·2005 Daily Journal DAR 10987·33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 803·17 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 10
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2005C043392California5,519 words

Opinion

Opinion

In accordance with the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, plaintiff Gary Ross had a physician's recommendation to use marijuana for his chronic back pain. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5 (hereafter the Compassionate Use Act or § 11362.5.)) Nevertheless, when plaintiff's employer, Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc. (defendant), learned plaintiff had tested positive for marijuana during a preemployment drug test, it discharged him from the position that he had held for eight days.

Plaintiff sued defendant for wrongful termination, employment discrimination, and breach of contract. Judgment was entered against plaintiff after defendant demurred successfully to his complaint.

On appeal, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in ruling that because his use of marijuana violated federal criminal statutes, defendant was justified as a matter of law in terminating plaintiff's employment even if his conduct did not violate state criminal laws due to the Compassionate Use Act. In plaintiff's view, defendant's action violated the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and constituted a wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

We shall affirm the judgment. As we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.