In Re Ramone R.

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 4th 1339·34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 344
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2005A107837California4,841 words

Opinion

Opinion

Parrilli, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1341 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1342 Elvina R. appeals from an order summarily denying her modification petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 , 1 and from an order under section 366.26, subdivision (b)(2) identifying adoption as the permanent placement goal for her son Ramone R. and allowing 180 days for finding an appropriate adoptive family. The latter order was premised on a finding that Ramone "has a probability for adoption but is difficult to place," and required the court to proceed with either adoption or legal guardianship as his permanent placement at the end of the 180-day period. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(3).) Ramone was currently placed in a foster home with a specially trained caretaker to help provide for his medical and other special needs. *Page 1343 We affirm the denial of the section 388 petition. We reverse the section 366.26, subdivision (b)(2) order because there was no evidence Ramone's adoption…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.