Monroy

Monroy v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
164 Cal. App. 4th 248·78 Cal. Rptr. 3d 738
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2008B196916California6,720 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

These two consolidated personal injury lawsuits were filed on behalf of two people after they were injured in a traffic accident involving a police vehicle. The jury found that the officer driving the police vehicle was not negligent and found against the two injured persons. The injured persons raise three evidentiary issues on appeal from the judgment rendered against them. We reverse.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Facts.

On September 4, 2004, Saturday of Labor Day weekend at approximately 10:45 p.m., Yesenia Monroy was driving a Mitsubishi Mirage eastbound on Third Street in Los Angeles. Her child (Phoebe P.) was sitting in a child safety seat in the back of the Mitsubishi.

Los Angeles Police Department Officer Felipe Jesus Arreola was operating a Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) vehicle. His partner, Jaime Garcia, was riding as a passenger. The officers were on routine patrol on Pleasant Avenue approaching Boyle Avenue when they heard a radio call. One of the gang units in the area was requesting backup for a foot pursuit of a man with a gun.

The operator designated the call as “Code 2” and directed another police unit to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.