Wilson

People v. Wilson

Good Law
164 Cal. App. 4th 988·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1038·79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 631
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2008C057523California1,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cantil-Sakauye, J.

In May 2005, defendant Jon Burgess Wilson entered a plea of guilty to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) in exchange for the dismissal of an additional charge of petty theft (shoplifting) (§ 490.5). The trial court placed defendant on three years’ formal probation. In October 2007, defendant admitted three violations of his probation. In November 2007, the trial court denied defendant reinstatement of probation and sentenced him to state prison for the upper term of three years.

On appeal, defendant claims the trial court’s imposition of the upper term violated his federal constitutional rights under Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [ 147 L.Ed.2d 435 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 ] (Apprendi), Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [ 159 L.Ed.2d 403 , 124 S.Ct. 2531 ] (Blakely), and Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. 270 [ 127 S.Ct. 856 , 166 L.Ed.2d 856 ] (Cunningham). We shall affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In July 2004, defendant and his wife entered a Wal-Mart store in Yuba County, with the intent to commit theft. They gathered a number of items into a shopping cart, removed the UPC (uniform product code) labels, and left the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.