In Re Marriage of Sonne

Good Law
164 Cal. App. 4th 1331·80 Cal. Rptr. 3d 453
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2008H030110California5,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1333 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1334 OPINION Both "Husband" and "Wife" appeal from the trial court's decision dividing their interests in Husband's California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) retirement allowance and survivor benefit. Husband contends that the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that repurchased service credits for Husband's years of service to his employer prior to his marriage to Wife were community property. The opportunity to repurchase these service credits arose when Husband's previous spouse, Dalia, withdrew the retirement contributions in her portion of Husband's PERS retirement account. These service credits were repurchased with community funds during the marriage. Husband also maintains that the trial court abused its discretion in assigning to Wife the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.