Fernandez

Fernandez v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation

Good Law
164 Cal. App. 4th 1214·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1059·80 Cal. Rptr. 3d 418·38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20176
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2008A114258California8,810 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

Within the California Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) there are two departments that play a role in the regulation of the use of pesticides in our state, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR). The OEHHA is the risk assessment arm of the EPA and helps establish the scientific basis for the risk management decisions of the EPA’s regulatory departments, such as the DPR. With regard to pesticide safety, OEHHA and DPR have shared responsibility for developing regulations. While OEHHA does not promulgate those regulations, it is responsible for developing and providing DPR with toxicological information relevant to its risk management decisions. Although the primary responsibility to ensure the safe use of pesticides rests with DPR, it is required to consult with OEHHA concerning risk assessment before adopting those regulations. This case concerns the working relationship between these two departments.

This appeal also concerns the extent of the power of DPR to regulate exposure levels for pesticides used for agricultural purposes. In particular, it concerns whether DPR has the power to identify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.