Ontiveros

Ontiveros v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.

Caution
164 Cal. App. 4th 494·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 964·79 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471·103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1300
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2008A114848California8,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Defendant DHL Express (USA), Inc. (defendant or DHL), appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration after plaintiff Gina Ontiveros (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against defendant DHL and four other defendants, raising various claims related to sex discrimination, harassment, and retaliation arising from her employment with defendant. Defendant claims that plaintiff’s lawsuit is precluded by an arbitration agreement previously entered into by both parties. Because we conclude the trial court properly found the arbitration agreement was unconscionable, and therefore unenforceable, we shall affirm the order.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 5, 2005, plaintiff filed a complaint for damages, in which she alleged (1) sex/gender discrimination and harassment, (2) failure to prevent sex/gender discrimination and harassment, (3) retaliation for opposing forbidden practices, and (4) aiding and abetting discrimination and harassment.

On June 2, 2006, defendant filed a petition to compel arbitration and motion to stay judicial proceedings.

On July 6, 2006, the trial court denied defendant’s motion to compel arbitration.

On July 19, 2006, defendant filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.