Ingram

People v. Ingram

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 4th 1745·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 703·21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 33·93 Daily Journal DAR 8623·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5120
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1993F018303California2,394 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brown, J.

The Case

Linda Kay Ingram appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting her of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (b)). She was placed on probation for three years on condition, inter alia, she serve one year in the county jail. On appeal, she contends (1) the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), and (2) the court mishandled her Marsden motion.

The Facts

The evidence presented at the hearing on the suppression motion showed that on August 20, 1991, members of the Bakersfield Police Department and agents from the Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement were conducting a joint investigation of the drug activities of John Ingram. About 1 p.m. that afternoon, Special Agent Larry Slate was surveilling Mr. Ingram’s business, the Capone Cycle House, in Bakersfield. The officers planned to execute search warrants later that day at the business and at Ingram’s residence.

While watching the Cycle House, Agent Slate saw a number of vehicles drive up to the business. One of these was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.