King

People v. King

Good Law
16 Cal. App. 4th 567·20 Cal. Rptr. 2d 220
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 1993A058038California3,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Newsom, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 569 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 570 OPINION Appellant was convicted following a jury trial of misdemeanor indecent exposure in violation of Penal Code section 314 , subdivision 1. 1 On appeal, he challenges that part of this sentence which requires him to register as a sex offender pursuant to section 290. The evidence presented at trial shows that Renee Lepre (hereafter Renee) was working as a street artist in front of the Shreve's Building in San Francisco on March 16, 1991. Around 11 a.m., in a nearby "alleyway," she observed appellant "exposing himself and soliciting women. . . ." As pedestrians passed the alleyway, appellant pointed to them and yelled: "Come and get some of this. Look at this. You need some of this." He also made other "lewd gestures" or comments "about sexual acts" to women who walked by the alley. As he yelled, appellant was "stroking his private parts," and had an "erection." Renee looked unsuccessfully for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.