Helliker

SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. Helliker

Bad Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 1135·42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 191
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 2006B175450California16,887 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. (Syngenta), developed a substance known as metalaxyl, and Dow Agrosciences LLC (Dow) developed a substance known as oryzalin, both used as active ingredients in pesticides. Syngenta and Dow submitted to the state Department of Pesticide Regulation (the Department) data concerning the health effects and environmental impacts of the active ingredients and obtained certificates of registration from the Department for products containing metalaxyl and oryzalin. Gustafson LLC (Gustafson), a pesticide manufacturer, later obtained registrations from the Department for pesticides containing metalaxyl, and other companies obtained registrations for pesticides containing oryzalin. Although the Department did not actually review data previously submitted to the Department by Syngenta and Dow to support the applications for registration by Gustafson and other subsequent applicants, the Department took into account its prior evaluation of those data in evaluating the later applications. Syngenta challenged the registrations and the Department’s practices by filing a complaint and petition for writ of mandate in the superior court seeking declaratory and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.