Gil

Gil v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 1371·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 617·2006 Daily Journal DAR 5104·42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310·59 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 755
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 27, 2006B181249California3,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Appellants Eduardo Gil (Eduardo) and Rafael Gil (Rafael) appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted the demurrer of respondent Bank of America, National Association (Bank) to their second amended complaint. We are asked to determine whether the California Uniform Commercial Code supersedes a payee’s common law cause of action for negligence where the collecting bank accepts a check with a missing indorsement. We hold that the negligence cause of action stated here is subsumed in a conversion action dictated by the California Uniform Commercial Code. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CONTENTIONS

Appellants contend that the trial court erred in granting Bank’s demurrer because; (1) the California Uniform Commercial Code does not supersede common law negligence claims where Bank paid on a check with a missing indorsement; (2) under the California Uniform Commercial Code, Bank is liable for conversion; and (3) appellants stated a cause of action for misrepresentation.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellants filed the operative second amended complaint (SAC) on October 4, 2004, against Bank and other defendants for, among other causes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.