Umana

People v. Umana

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 625·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 521·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4370·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 573·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3063
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2006C047790California5,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

Defendants Jessica Langshaw and Raul Umana attempted to extort money and property from a number of men with whom Langshaw had maintained brief sexual relations. They were convicted of multiple counts of attempted extortion (Pen. Code, § 524; further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code), and delivering a threatening writing with intent to extort (§ 523). Langshaw was also convicted of three counts of falsely reporting a crime. (§ 148.5, subd. (a).) Langshaw was sentenced to state prison for seven years eight months and was ordered to pay restitution of $1,600 and victim restitution of $1,550. Umana was sentenced to state prison for five years and was ordered to pay restitution of $600 and victim restitution of $1,550.

Both defendants appeal. Langshaw contends the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction on one count of extortion and one count of sending a threatening letter with intent to extort. She further contends the trial court improperly admitted evidence of uncharged crimes, gave an improper pinpoint instruction, and unlawfully imposed consecutive terms. Umana joins in Langshaw’s arguments and further challenges his victim restitution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.