McVeigh

McVeigh v. DOES 1 THROUGH 3

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 898·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 545·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4659·42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 91·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3225
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2006B181275California2,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

This case arises under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, subdivision (h), which concerns the certificates of merit required in certain actions alleging childhood sexual abuse. It poses a single question: Whether a section 340.1, subdivision (h)(3) certificate setting forth facts which justify late filing of the subdivision (h)(1) and (h)(2) certificates may be filed with those certificates, even after the period of limitations, or whether the (h)(3) certificate must be filed with the complaint, within the period of limitations. We hold that the subdivision (h)(3) certificate may be filed with the (h)(1) and (h)(2) certificates, which may, under the terms of the statute, be filed as much as 60 days after the complaint is filed, even after the period of limitations.

These are the relevant facts and statutes:

Three subparts follow that critical colon. Under subdivision (h)(1) the attorney’s certificate must state that the attorney has reviewed the facts of the case, consulted with a qualified mental health practitioner, and concluded that there was reasonable and meritorious cause for filing the action. Under section 340.1, subdivision (h)(2), the mental health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.