Taylor

Taylor v. Roseville Toyota, Inc.

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 994·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 564·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4826·42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 68·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3362
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 2006C050008California5,649 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cantil-Sakauye, J.

Derrick Lewis, an employee of Roseville Toyota, Inc., was driving a car owned by Roseville Toyota on a personal errand on his lunch break when he rear-ended a car stopped at a stoplight. The driver and passenger of such car, Jason and Amy Taylor (plaintiffs), filed an action against Lewis and Roseville Toyota for personal damages resulting from the accident. A jury found by special verdict Lewis was negligent, his negligence was a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiffs, and while Lewis was not acting within the scope of his employment, Roseville Toyota had given Lewis permission, by words or conduct, to use its car at the time of the accident. Roseville Toyota was found liable for a total of $277,662 in damages. Roseville Toyota appeals both the judgment and the trial court’s subsequent order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Roseville Toyota contends the jury’s finding of permissive use was not supported by substantial evidence, the trial court should have granted the judgment notwithstanding the verdict because of the insufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court erred in instructing the jury with plaintiff’s special jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.