Andrews

Andrews v. Foster Wheeler LLC

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 96·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 458·2006 Daily Journal DAR 3817·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2667
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2006A108911California6,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Plaintiffs Paul and Eileen Andrews seek reversal of the trial

court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Foster Wheeler LLC (Foster Wheeler). We affirm the trial court’s judgment because plaintiffs have not established a triable issue of fact regarding causation.

BACKGROUND

In September 2003, plaintiffs filed products liability claims in superior court in San Francisco against dozens of manufacturers, suppliers, and contractors for allegedly causing the asbestos-related disease suffered by Paul Andrews (Andrews), then 70 years old, as a result of exposure to asbestos during his years of employment. Among other things, the complaint set forth a history of Andrews’s work as a laborer, deckhand, and gunner’s mate for over 20 years at multiple naval facilities and on naval vessels, including the USS Brinkley Bass (Brinkley Bass). On October 14, 2004, plaintiffs filed an amendment to their complaint which identified Foster Wheeler as the entity sued under the fictitious name “DOE 1.”

The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion below for trial preference and scheduled a trial date for approximately nine months after the filing of the original complaint. Foster…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.