Huff

Huff v. Wilkins

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 732·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 754
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2006D044895California5,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, P.J.

In Distefano v. Forester (2001) 85 Cal. App.4th 1249, 1254 , 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 813 ( Distefano ), this court held the primary assumption of risk doctrine the Supreme Court articulated in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 , 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 , 834 P.2d 696 ( Knight ), applies to the sport of "off-roading." The issue in this case is whether the doctrine bars a tort action arising from an off-roading collision in which the 14-year-old operator of an allterrain vehicle (ATV) was driving in violation of Vehicle Code section 38503, a safety regulation that prohibits a person under 18 years of age from operating an ATV on public land without adult supervision or a prescribed safety training program, and a companion Bureau of Land Management (BLM) safety rule.

We reverse a summary judgment for the defendants. We conclude this violation of safety regulations is not within the range of activities ordinarily involved in the sport of off-roading, and to the extent the violation increased the inherent risk of a collision, the plaintiff did not assume the increased risk merely by participating in the sport. It was the defendants' burden to establish the violation did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.