In Re Marcus

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 1009·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 559·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4597·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 861·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2006H028866California3,134 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

The trial court found petitioner Stacy Lynn Marcus (Mother) guilty of contempt for interfering with a court-ordered visit between Mother’s former husband, Ittai Haim Bareket (Father) and their daughter Sydney (Daughter). The court fined Mother $1,000, sentenced her to five days in jail and 120 hours of community service, and ordered her to pay $7,500 in attorney fees. Mother has petitioned this court for a writ of habeas corpus to prevent the superior court from executing the sentence. Mother does not deny that she committed the acts underlying the contempt. Rather, she maintains that the order she allegedly disobeyed was not a written order and, therefore, cannot be the basis for contempt. We agree and grant relief.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mother and Father were married in 1992. Daughter was bom in 1999. She is the only child of the marriage. The family was residing in California when Father petitioned for dissolution of the marriage in May 2000. Mother and Daughter moved to New York while the dissolution was pending—around September 2001. A status-only judgment of dissolution has since been entered and Father has remarried.

In February 2003, the family…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.